Rapid Consensus Profiling

Rapid Consensus Profiling

Introduction

To develop a consensus profile, panellists assess products and compile a list of attributes for describing them. Once all panellists complete this task, they convene as a group to discuss their findings and collectively decide on the attributes to be used for the test. Subsequently, panellists assess the intensity of each agreed-upon attribute, following a process similar to conventional profiling.

Template Description

The template starts with a welcome screen containing instructions for the panellists. Following this is the attribute generation task, utilizing the Dynamic List question type named "freeattributes," which should remain unchanged. In the default settings for this question, you have the flexibility to adjust the minimum and maximum attributes each panellist can generate. More information can be found in the following articles: https://support.eyequestion.nl/portal/en/kb/articles/how-to-include-more-attributes-in-the-free-choice-profiling-flash-profile-template
After the completion of the attribute generation task by each panellist, a wait screen appears. During this interval, the group can review and discuss the generated attributes, guided by the panel leader. The panel leader can access the comprehensive list of attributes generated by the group by selecting the "freeattributes" question type and navigating to Advanced Settings > Overview List.
Within the overview list, the panel leader has the authority to choose the attributes that the group has agreed upon and eliminate those deemed unfit for the final evaluation. Additionally, the panel leader can opt to add more attributes not generated by any panellists.
Once the list is finalized, panelists can proceed by selecting "next" on their screens, and they can select which attributes should be used for the final evaluation based on the group discussion. 






In the design section, the first screen includes instructions; followed by questions where panellists can rate the intensity of the products with the chosen attributes. The Standard Line scale question type has been used for this template. The amount of questions in the design section are based upon the amount the panellist gave or the user has set up in the "Attribute Generation" screen. By default this template has set the maximum to 10 attributes. If the user would like to increase or decrease the maximum, the amount of questions in the design section of the project needs to be adjusted as well. 

In the end screen, the template incorporates a “thank you” message, providing an opportunity for you to personalize a final message for the panellists. 

Within the design settings, you can see that the template is created with a monadic design. This means that the panellists will receive and evaluate each product separately. Within this template, there are five products included. You have the flexibility to adjust this amount in the design generator and edit the product properties by clicking on the Product section. 

Raw Data Representation

The raw data will be displayed with each row corresponding to a product evaluated by a judge (panellist), followed by the attributes that the panellist generated. The column next to the generated attribute will show you the attributes the panellist has chosen to evaluate the products with. Based upon this selection, the columns are filled. For example, when the panelist chose only two attributes, then only two columns will be additional filled. 

Analysis

Once data has been gathered, you can  access EyeOpenR and navigate to the Flash Profiling/ Free Profiling method. Additional details about this analysis can be found in the following article: https://support.eyequestion.nl/portal/en/kb/articles/flash-profiling-and-free-choice-profiling

References

  1. Kemp, S., Hort, J., & Hollowood, T. (2018) Descriptive Analysis in Sensory Evaluation. 

    • Related Articles

    • Flash Profiling

      Introduction Flash profiling is an alternative sensory analysis technique adapted from Free Choice Profiling to understand the sensory positioning of products. Untrained panellists select their own attributes to describe and evaluate a set of ...
    • Free Choice Profiling

      Introduction Free-choice profiling (FCP) is a quick and inexpensive method in which consumers are asked to both identify attributes in the sample and rate the liking and/or intensity of those attributes. They should be provided with adequate ...
    • Profiling Dynamic Design Section

      Introduction Quantitative descriptive testing and sensory profiling serve as potent methodologies for understanding the sensory attributes of products. By conducting structured assessments, trained panelists assign intensity values to various sensory ...
    • Flash Profiling and Free Choice Profiling

      Purpose Flash Profiling is a rapid type of descriptive method adapted from free choice profiling. Normally used with untrained judges, each individual selects their own attributes to describe at set of products. They then use these attributes to rank ...
    • Flavour Profiling

      Introduction The Flavour Profiling Template provides a method for conducting flavor profiling tests, emphasizing aroma, taste, and aftertaste attributes. In this test, each characteristic, such as aroma, is evaluated across all included products. ...