Remarks Representation

Remarks Representation

Purpose

The remarks representation method can be used to display remark and comment data.

Options

  1. Split Results On: Choose to split your results on either Judge, Attribute, Product or Session. Alternatively, choose None if you do not wish to split your results.
  2. Add Extra Value: Include another attribute to include with your results
    1. Extra Question to Add: Choose which additional attributes to include with your results
  3. Order by Extra Column: Order your results according to the additional attribute you added to the results, choose either from low to high values or from high to low values.
  4. Add Assessors Column: Add information about the assessors to your results
  5. Add Products Column: Add information about your products to the results
  6. Flat Representation: Add an additional tab to your results in which your results are presented in a single row.
  7. Show Total: Decide whether to include the total number of occurrences of each remark in your results
  8. Order by Frequency: Choose to order your results by remark frequency
  9. Show Duplicated Values: Choose whether or not to remove duplicated remarks from your results
  10. Case Sensitive: Choose whether EyeOpenR should ignore case when identifying multiple cases of the same remark
  11. Anonymise Assessors: Choose which assessor variable to include in your results or replace with a random value
  12. Anonymise Products: Choose which product variable to include in your results or replace with a random value
  13. Anonymise Attributes: Choose which attribute variable to include in your results or replace with a random value

Results and Interpretation

If you have split your results a new tab will be added for each Judge, Attribute, Product or Session. 
Columns within the results table:
  1. Remark: The remark text
  2. Remark Frequency: The total number of occurrences of the given remark in your dataset. This is only included if you have chosen the Show Total option.

    • Related Articles

    • Duo-Trio

      Introduction The Duo-Trio Test is a sensory test that can determine the presence or absence of sensory differences between two samples. This method is particularly valuable in: The Duo-Trio test can be comparable to the triangle test, maintaining ...
    • Three-Alternative Forced Choice (3-AFC)

      Introduction The three-alternative forced choice (3-AFC) method is a discrimination method where panelists are presented with three samples simultaneously and instructed to identify the sample(s) that are higher or lower in a specified sensory ...
    • Two-Alternative Forced Choice (2-AFC)

      Introduction The Two-Alternative Forced Choice (2-AFC) method, is a specific way of comparing two samples in sensory science. In this method, the only allowed difference between the two samples is a specified sensory characteristic. It works well ...
    • A/NOT A

      Introduction In sensory testing, A-not-A tests are used to evaluate the sensory discrimination ability of individuals when presented with different products. Panelists are typically provided with a single sample (A or Not A) and tasked with ...
    • Same-Different

      Introduction During a Same-Different test, each panellist is presented with two (equal or different) products or samples. The panellist must state whether the products are equal or different. This method is used to determine whether a sensory ...